<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1912 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285051</link>
    <description>Bail was granted in a case alleging cheating, forgery and criminal conspiracy after the court found that the petitioner had spent about ten months in custody, one co-accused had already obtained bail, another accused remained absconding, and the trial was likely to take time. The case against the petitioner was described as resting mainly on documentary material, which supported release on bail subject to conditions, including furnishing a personal bond and surety bond.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2019 17:51:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1912 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285051</link>
      <description>Bail was granted in a case alleging cheating, forgery and criminal conspiracy after the court found that the petitioner had spent about ten months in custody, one co-accused had already obtained bail, another accused remained absconding, and the trial was likely to take time. The case against the petitioner was described as resting mainly on documentary material, which supported release on bail subject to conditions, including furnishing a personal bond and surety bond.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>