https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285049 The court upheld the forfeiture of the Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) due to the petitioner's failure to comply with payment obligations within the specified time frame. However, the decision to debar the petitioner from future tenders was set aside as the court found that principles of natural justice were not followed, directing the authority to provide an opportunity for the petitioner to respond before imposing any punitive measures. The court affirmed the validity of the Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) clauses while emphasizing the importance of fairness and proportionality in blacklisting decisions. en-us Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Dec 2019 17:51:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285049 The court upheld the forfeiture of the Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) due to the petitioner's failure to comply with payment obligations within the specified time frame. However, the decision to debar the petitioner from future tenders was set aside as the court found that principles of natural justice were not followed, directing the authority to provide an opportunity for the petitioner to respond before imposing any punitive measures. The court affirmed the validity of the Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) clauses while emphasizing the importance of fairness and proportionality in blacklisting decisions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285049