<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1738 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285053</link>
    <description>At the stage of framing of charge, the accused ordinarily cannot invoke Section 91 CrPC to compel production of material not included in the charge-sheet, because the court does not examine the defence at that stage. However, the court retains a limited power to call for withheld material where it is of sterling quality and has a crucial bearing on whether a charge should be framed, if production is necessary in the interests of justice. The accused has no independent right to seek such production dehors the court&#039;s satisfaction. The contrary view of the HC was set aside, and the trial court was directed to reconsider framing of charge on these principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1738 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285053</link>
      <description>At the stage of framing of charge, the accused ordinarily cannot invoke Section 91 CrPC to compel production of material not included in the charge-sheet, because the court does not examine the defence at that stage. However, the court retains a limited power to call for withheld material where it is of sterling quality and has a crucial bearing on whether a charge should be framed, if production is necessary in the interests of justice. The accused has no independent right to seek such production dehors the court&#039;s satisfaction. The contrary view of the HC was set aside, and the trial court was directed to reconsider framing of charge on these principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>