<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1292 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285048</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the termination of temporary catering service licenses by IRCTC due to non-fulfillment of contractual obligations. It emphasized the validity of the tender document clauses allowing for debarment without the need for additional notice. Despite acknowledging the disproportionate debarment punishment, the Court reduced the debarment period to one month and ordered a specific fee refund, considering the petitioner&#039;s history with Railways. The judgment highlighted the principle of proportionality in punishments and concluded the case with the revised debarment period and refund directive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2019 17:44:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1292 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285048</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the termination of temporary catering service licenses by IRCTC due to non-fulfillment of contractual obligations. It emphasized the validity of the tender document clauses allowing for debarment without the need for additional notice. Despite acknowledging the disproportionate debarment punishment, the Court reduced the debarment period to one month and ordered a specific fee refund, considering the petitioner&#039;s history with Railways. The judgment highlighted the principle of proportionality in punishments and concluded the case with the revised debarment period and refund directive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>