<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 731 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285046</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the penalty order under section 271E was not time-barred, favoring the Revenue. However, it found errors in the Tribunal&#039;s decision as it failed to assess the default under section 269T and any reasonable cause for the default under section 273B. The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remanded the matter for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for proper consideration of the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2019 17:34:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 731 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285046</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the penalty order under section 271E was not time-barred, favoring the Revenue. However, it found errors in the Tribunal&#039;s decision as it failed to assess the default under section 269T and any reasonable cause for the default under section 273B. The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remanded the matter for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for proper consideration of the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>