<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 996 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390113</link>
    <description>In a prosecution under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 involving alleged creation of fake firms, issuance of fake invoices and wrongful availment of Input Tax Credit, the Rajasthan HC declined to grant bail. The Court noted that the investigation was still in progress and considered the allegations serious in nature. On that factual basis, it found no ground to exercise discretionary relief in favour of the petitioner, and the bail application was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 996 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390113</link>
      <description>In a prosecution under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 involving alleged creation of fake firms, issuance of fake invoices and wrongful availment of Input Tax Credit, the Rajasthan HC declined to grant bail. The Court noted that the investigation was still in progress and considered the allegations serious in nature. On that factual basis, it found no ground to exercise discretionary relief in favour of the petitioner, and the bail application was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>