https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390107 Interim relief cannot be used to grant the substantive relief sought in a writ petition at the threshold, especially where the interim prayer is in substance identical to the final relief and would dispose of the main controversy. A purely interlocutory order that does not finally adjudicate the lis or determine vested rights is also not appealable under the proviso to Section 2(1) of the Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act, 2006. The challenge to the refusal of stay was therefore found not maintainable, leaving the writ petition to proceed on its own merits. en-us Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390107 Interim relief cannot be used to grant the substantive relief sought in a writ petition at the threshold, especially where the interim prayer is in substance identical to the final relief and would dispose of the main controversy. A purely interlocutory order that does not finally adjudicate the lis or determine vested rights is also not appealable under the proviso to Section 2(1) of the Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act, 2006. The challenge to the refusal of stay was therefore found not maintainable, leaving the writ petition to proceed on its own merits. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390107