<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 980 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390097</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on all contested issues. It invalidated the disallowance under Section 14A, classifying the subsidies received under the New Industrial Policy as capital receipts, and allowed the deduction of education cess as an expenditure under Section 37. The decision underscored the significance of judicial precedents and legislative intent in tax liability determinations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 980 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390097</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on all contested issues. It invalidated the disallowance under Section 14A, classifying the subsidies received under the New Industrial Policy as capital receipts, and allowed the deduction of education cess as an expenditure under Section 37. The decision underscored the significance of judicial precedents and legislative intent in tax liability determinations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>