<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 954 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390071</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed an appeal under Section 129A of the Customs Act for failing to comply with the mandatory deposit requirement. It extensively discussed Section 129E, emphasizing the need to deposit a percentage of duty or penalty before filing an appeal. The Court highlighted the dismissal of appeals and writ petitions due to non-compliance with pre-deposit requirements, refusing to waive or reduce such amounts. Judicial interpretation underscored the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and upholding procedural norms in customs cases, maintaining consistency in dismissing appeals related to fraudulent export activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2019 09:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 954 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390071</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed an appeal under Section 129A of the Customs Act for failing to comply with the mandatory deposit requirement. It extensively discussed Section 129E, emphasizing the need to deposit a percentage of duty or penalty before filing an appeal. The Court highlighted the dismissal of appeals and writ petitions due to non-compliance with pre-deposit requirements, refusing to waive or reduce such amounts. Judicial interpretation underscored the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and upholding procedural norms in customs cases, maintaining consistency in dismissing appeals related to fraudulent export activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>