<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (2) TMI 61 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20814</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction of gratuity liability for an unregistered firm for the assessment year 1975-76. The court found that the liability accrued earlier and was integrally connected to the normal course of business operations, making it deductible for income tax purposes. The judgment emphasized the importance of distinguishing between different types of liabilities when assessing deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:19:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (2) TMI 61 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20814</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction of gratuity liability for an unregistered firm for the assessment year 1975-76. The court found that the liability accrued earlier and was integrally connected to the normal course of business operations, making it deductible for income tax purposes. The judgment emphasized the importance of distinguishing between different types of liabilities when assessing deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>