<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 930 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390047</link>
    <description>SIM cards were held not to be &quot;goods&quot; for entry tax purposes because, in the telecom context, they are integral to the service provided rather than independent items sold as goods. The Entry Tax Act&#039;s definition of &quot;goods&quot; had to be read consistently with the VAT enactment, and the earlier binding view on the same subject was treated as controlling. As a result, no liability under Section 3(1) of the Entry Tax Act, 1976 arose on SIM cards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2019 10:26:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 930 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390047</link>
      <description>SIM cards were held not to be &quot;goods&quot; for entry tax purposes because, in the telecom context, they are integral to the service provided rather than independent items sold as goods. The Entry Tax Act&#039;s definition of &quot;goods&quot; had to be read consistently with the VAT enactment, and the earlier binding view on the same subject was treated as controlling. As a result, no liability under Section 3(1) of the Entry Tax Act, 1976 arose on SIM cards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>