https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390043 A taxpayer was permitted to make the further statutory deposit of 20% of the remaining disputed tax where the second appellate tribunal under the U.P. GST regime had not yet been constituted. Because 10% of the disputed liability had already been deposited at the first appeal stage, the Court treated the additional deposit as sufficient under the statutory scheme and directed that recovery of the balance would remain stayed on such deposit. en-us Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Mar 2025 14:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390043 A taxpayer was permitted to make the further statutory deposit of 20% of the remaining disputed tax where the second appellate tribunal under the U.P. GST regime had not yet been constituted. Because 10% of the disputed liability had already been deposited at the first appeal stage, the Court treated the additional deposit as sufficient under the statutory scheme and directed that recovery of the balance would remain stayed on such deposit. Case-Laws GST Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390043