<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 920 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390037</link>
    <description>The court upheld the transfer of assessment from one tax authority to another, citing the petitioners&#039; awareness of the reasons for the transfer and the sensitive nature of the investigations involving international implications and financial irregularities. The court emphasized the balance between transparency in administrative decisions and the need for confidentiality in complex cases, ultimately dismissing the petition as not suitable for intervention under Article 226 of the Constitution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2020 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 920 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390037</link>
      <description>The court upheld the transfer of assessment from one tax authority to another, citing the petitioners&#039; awareness of the reasons for the transfer and the sensitive nature of the investigations involving international implications and financial irregularities. The court emphasized the balance between transparency in administrative decisions and the need for confidentiality in complex cases, ultimately dismissing the petition as not suitable for intervention under Article 226 of the Constitution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>