<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 918 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390035</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to re-examine the addition under section 69 of the Income Tax Act, considering evidence of the brother&#039;s remittances for property acquisition. The Tribunal emphasized the need to uphold principles of natural justice and thoroughly evaluate all evidence in tax assessments. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, stressing the importance of a just and fair outcome in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2019 07:45:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 918 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390035</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to re-examine the addition under section 69 of the Income Tax Act, considering evidence of the brother&#039;s remittances for property acquisition. The Tribunal emphasized the need to uphold principles of natural justice and thoroughly evaluate all evidence in tax assessments. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, stressing the importance of a just and fair outcome in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>