<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 908 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390025</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee for AY 2011-12, as the penalty under section 271(1)(c) r.w. Explanation 5A was unjustified. Penalties in other appeals for the same assessment year were also deleted as no incriminating documents were found during the search, following a precedent that such evidence is necessary for imposing penalties under Explanation 5A. All four appeals were allowed, and the penalties were revoked.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2019 07:42:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 908 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390025</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee for AY 2011-12, as the penalty under section 271(1)(c) r.w. Explanation 5A was unjustified. Penalties in other appeals for the same assessment year were also deleted as no incriminating documents were found during the search, following a precedent that such evidence is necessary for imposing penalties under Explanation 5A. All four appeals were allowed, and the penalties were revoked.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>