https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285029 A structure within CRZ-III was found to be a later unauthorized construction, not an existing authorized structure as on 19 February 1991, because contemporaneous records showed only a small garage on the plot and the disputed building was materially different and within 100 metres of the High Tide Line. The applicable CRZ regime barred new construction in the No Development Zone, and local permission could not override binding coastal directions or legalise use as a restaurant and bar. The demolition and consequential directions were therefore upheld, and the appeal failed on merits. en-us Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 22 Dec 2019 07:26:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285029 A structure within CRZ-III was found to be a later unauthorized construction, not an existing authorized structure as on 19 February 1991, because contemporaneous records showed only a small garage on the plot and the disputed building was materially different and within 100 metres of the High Tide Line. The applicable CRZ regime barred new construction in the No Development Zone, and local permission could not override binding coastal directions or legalise use as a restaurant and bar. The demolition and consequential directions were therefore upheld, and the appeal failed on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285029