https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285019 Property held by petitioners as trustees for a school could not be taken over or interfered with unless supported by authority of law under Article 31(1). The Bihar Education Code direction relied on was only an administrative instruction, with no statutory backing and therefore no force of law under Article 13. As a result, executive action based on that direction could not justify disturbance of possession or management of the school land and building, and interference with the petitioners' rights was unauthorised and invalid. en-us Mon, 13 Oct 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Dec 2019 15:52:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285019 Property held by petitioners as trustees for a school could not be taken over or interfered with unless supported by authority of law under Article 31(1). The Bihar Education Code direction relied on was only an administrative instruction, with no statutory backing and therefore no force of law under Article 13. As a result, executive action based on that direction could not justify disturbance of possession or management of the school land and building, and interference with the petitioners' rights was unauthorised and invalid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 13 Oct 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285019