https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285017 The appeal was dismissed, upholding the lower court's decision decreeing the plaintiff's suit for contribution or reimbursement in a partnership agreement dispute. The court found that a minor cannot be a partner in a firm but can benefit from it. The appellant's claim of coercion in signing the registered document was rejected, emphasizing that partners are not debtor and creditor until accounts are settled. The court ruled that the plaintiff was entitled to bring the suit based on the settlement document, making the other partner an unnecessary party, and ordered the appellant to bear the costs. en-us Wed, 31 Jan 1945 00:00:00 +0630 Sat, 21 Dec 2019 14:37:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285017 The appeal was dismissed, upholding the lower court's decision decreeing the plaintiff's suit for contribution or reimbursement in a partnership agreement dispute. The court found that a minor cannot be a partner in a firm but can benefit from it. The appellant's claim of coercion in signing the registered document was rejected, emphasizing that partners are not debtor and creditor until accounts are settled. The court ruled that the plaintiff was entitled to bring the suit based on the settlement document, making the other partner an unnecessary party, and ordered the appellant to bear the costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 31 Jan 1945 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285017