<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 805 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285015</link>
    <description>Appellate judgments allowing a suit must clearly state the relief granted so that the decree conforms to the judgment and remains self-contained and executable. The same discipline applies under Order XLI Rule 31, and if the appellate judgment omits the extent or manner of relief intended, the omission is treated as an accidental slip or omission in recording the court&#039;s intention. In that situation, the proper course is rectification under Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure rather than leaving the decree uncertain. The text states that the omission required correction and that the trial court decree could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2019 12:38:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 805 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285015</link>
      <description>Appellate judgments allowing a suit must clearly state the relief granted so that the decree conforms to the judgment and remains self-contained and executable. The same discipline applies under Order XLI Rule 31, and if the appellate judgment omits the extent or manner of relief intended, the omission is treated as an accidental slip or omission in recording the court&#039;s intention. In that situation, the proper course is rectification under Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure rather than leaving the decree uncertain. The text states that the omission required correction and that the trial court decree could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>