<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (2) TMI 57 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20802</link>
    <description>Under section 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, no reference was warranted on the assessee&#039;s claim to exemption under section 5(1)(iv) in respect of a share in a building owned by a firm. The High Court noted that the issue was already covered by a binding Full Bench decision, which had applied Supreme Court principles, and that the Tribunal&#039;s view granting the exemption was consistent with that precedent. Because the question was settled by existing authority, the Revenue&#039;s proposed question of law did not give rise to a referable issue. The petition seeking a direction to refer the question was therefore refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:51:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (2) TMI 57 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20802</link>
      <description>Under section 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, no reference was warranted on the assessee&#039;s claim to exemption under section 5(1)(iv) in respect of a share in a building owned by a firm. The High Court noted that the issue was already covered by a binding Full Bench decision, which had applied Supreme Court principles, and that the Tribunal&#039;s view granting the exemption was consistent with that precedent. Because the question was settled by existing authority, the Revenue&#039;s proposed question of law did not give rise to a referable issue. The petition seeking a direction to refer the question was therefore refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>