<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 892 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390009</link>
    <description>Revenue&#039;s challenge to CESTAT&#039;s ruling on exemption for dyeing activity in job-work manufacturing was withdrawn after the departmental monetary limit for High Court appeals was revised to Rs. 1 crore and applied to pending matters. The Court recorded that the duty involved was below the revised threshold, so the appeal did not proceed and the substantial questions of law were left open. As the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, no separate order was required on the pending condonation application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2019 10:29:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 892 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390009</link>
      <description>Revenue&#039;s challenge to CESTAT&#039;s ruling on exemption for dyeing activity in job-work manufacturing was withdrawn after the departmental monetary limit for High Court appeals was revised to Rs. 1 crore and applied to pending matters. The Court recorded that the duty involved was below the revised threshold, so the appeal did not proceed and the substantial questions of law were left open. As the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, no separate order was required on the pending condonation application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>