https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390008 The court directed the Revenue Counsel to facilitate the refund mechanism between government institutions. The counsel for Revenue assured that if FCI applied for a refund and proved the burden was not passed on, the claim would be decided within two months. FCI/HAFED committed to pay the lease money to the petitioner before the next hearing, with no entitlement to interest on the due amounts. Eventually, the refund amount was confirmed to be handed over to FCI Hisar, and the petitioner acknowledged receiving the due amount from HAFED through FCI. The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous due to the resolution achieved through court intervention, indicating no further adjudication was necessary. en-us Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Dec 2019 10:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390008 The court directed the Revenue Counsel to facilitate the refund mechanism between government institutions. The counsel for Revenue assured that if FCI applied for a refund and proved the burden was not passed on, the claim would be decided within two months. FCI/HAFED committed to pay the lease money to the petitioner before the next hearing, with no entitlement to interest on the due amounts. Eventually, the refund amount was confirmed to be handed over to FCI Hisar, and the petitioner acknowledged receiving the due amount from HAFED through FCI. The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous due to the resolution achieved through court intervention, indicating no further adjudication was necessary. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390008