<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 471 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285013</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the bank&#039;s appeal in a dispute over a forged signature on a cheque, setting aside the High Court&#039;s interim order directing the bank to credit the amount to the company&#039;s account. The Court emphasized the importance of considering all relevant factors before granting interim relief and directed the company to refund the credited amount to the bank within a month. Failure to comply would result in enforcement by the High Court. The judgment underscored the necessity of early disposal of the writ petition and cautioned against granting interim orders that effectively provide the main relief sought without proper consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2019 10:23:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 471 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285013</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the bank&#039;s appeal in a dispute over a forged signature on a cheque, setting aside the High Court&#039;s interim order directing the bank to credit the amount to the company&#039;s account. The Court emphasized the importance of considering all relevant factors before granting interim relief and directed the company to refund the credited amount to the bank within a month. Failure to comply would result in enforcement by the High Court. The judgment underscored the necessity of early disposal of the writ petition and cautioned against granting interim orders that effectively provide the main relief sought without proper consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>