<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 887 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390004</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the Adjudicating authority for a detailed analysis of unjust enrichment, quantum of refund, and other issues. The Adjudicating authority&#039;s decision on limitation was overturned, finding the refund claim was not time-barred. Despite rejecting the claim on unjust enrichment grounds, the Commissioner (Appeals) did not thoroughly examine the evidence. The matter was sent back for further examination within six months, ensuring a fair hearing for the Appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2019 10:10:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 887 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390004</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the Adjudicating authority for a detailed analysis of unjust enrichment, quantum of refund, and other issues. The Adjudicating authority&#039;s decision on limitation was overturned, finding the refund claim was not time-barred. Despite rejecting the claim on unjust enrichment grounds, the Commissioner (Appeals) did not thoroughly examine the evidence. The matter was sent back for further examination within six months, ensuring a fair hearing for the Appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>