<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (2) TMI 122 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285012</link>
    <description>Pronouncement of an industrial tribunal&#039;s award in open court was held to be mandatory where the statutory scheme made the date of the award significant for correction and appeal. The requirement fixed the award date, informed parties when it took effect, preserved the time to seek correction of clerical or arithmetical mistakes, and made the appeal period workable; non-compliance rendered the award a nullity. The open-court pronouncement provision was also held intra vires, because section 6 of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act regulated submission of the award to the Government but did not restrict the mode of making the award, and the order was a valid supplementary measure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2019 10:07:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (2) TMI 122 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285012</link>
      <description>Pronouncement of an industrial tribunal&#039;s award in open court was held to be mandatory where the statutory scheme made the date of the award significant for correction and appeal. The requirement fixed the award date, informed parties when it took effect, preserved the time to seek correction of clerical or arithmetical mistakes, and made the appeal period workable; non-compliance rendered the award a nullity. The open-court pronouncement provision was also held intra vires, because section 6 of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act regulated submission of the award to the Government but did not restrict the mode of making the award, and the order was a valid supplementary measure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>