<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (1) TMI 28 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20800</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the receipts in question were eligible for deduction under section 80-I of the Income-tax Act, finding them to be incidental to the business activities of the assessee. The court determined that the expression &quot;attributable to&quot; in section 80-I has a broader meaning than &quot;derived from,&quot; in line with relevant case law precedents. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the court ruled in favor of the assessee without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:45:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (1) TMI 28 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20800</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the receipts in question were eligible for deduction under section 80-I of the Income-tax Act, finding them to be incidental to the business activities of the assessee. The court determined that the expression &quot;attributable to&quot; in section 80-I has a broader meaning than &quot;derived from,&quot; in line with relevant case law precedents. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the court ruled in favor of the assessee without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>