https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390000 A writ challenge to VAT and CST assessment orders was not entertained because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The petitioner was permitted to pursue the appellate remedy, and if the appeal was filed within the stipulated period, the appellate authority was directed to consider it on merits without raising limitation objections. In light of the garnishee notice and the pending appeal, the Court also stayed coercive recovery until the appellate authority decided the stay application, subject to compliance with Section 63(4) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. en-us Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Dec 2019 10:06:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390000 A writ challenge to VAT and CST assessment orders was not entertained because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The petitioner was permitted to pursue the appellate remedy, and if the appeal was filed within the stipulated period, the appellate authority was directed to consider it on merits without raising limitation objections. In light of the garnishee notice and the pending appeal, the Court also stayed coercive recovery until the appellate authority decided the stay application, subject to compliance with Section 63(4) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390000