<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1695 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285009</link>
    <description>Deduction under section 80-IC is unavailable unless the assessee proves genuine commencement of manufacturing at the claimed unit. The Tribunal noted that absence of plant, machinery, workforce and other operational indicia can negate a claim of actual manufacturing activity, and that unsupported turnover assertions are insufficient. It also examined the statutory bar on using previously used machinery beyond the prescribed limit, stressing that the assessee must prove compliance with the machinery condition through reliable evidence. Finally, it treated a unit lacking independent infrastructure or manpower as potentially falling within splitting up or reconstruction of an existing business, which disqualifies the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2019 10:04:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1695 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285009</link>
      <description>Deduction under section 80-IC is unavailable unless the assessee proves genuine commencement of manufacturing at the claimed unit. The Tribunal noted that absence of plant, machinery, workforce and other operational indicia can negate a claim of actual manufacturing activity, and that unsupported turnover assertions are insufficient. It also examined the statutory bar on using previously used machinery beyond the prescribed limit, stressing that the assessee must prove compliance with the machinery condition through reliable evidence. Finally, it treated a unit lacking independent infrastructure or manpower as potentially falling within splitting up or reconstruction of an existing business, which disqualifies the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>