<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 878 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389995</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) did not properly exercise jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The PCIT&#039;s order setting aside the assessment under section 143(3) was deemed unsustainable as the PCIT failed to independently assess the situation and relied on the Assessing Officer&#039;s proposal. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the PCIT&#039;s order, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2019 10:03:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 878 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389995</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) did not properly exercise jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The PCIT&#039;s order setting aside the assessment under section 143(3) was deemed unsustainable as the PCIT failed to independently assess the situation and relied on the Assessing Officer&#039;s proposal. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the PCIT&#039;s order, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>