<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1678 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284999</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty of Rs. 2,20,617/- levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The penalty was deemed unjustified as the additional income was disclosed in a valid return filed after the survey, and there was no concealment or non-disclosure warranting the penalty. The order was pronounced on June 5, 2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 18:14:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1678 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284999</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty of Rs. 2,20,617/- levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The penalty was deemed unjustified as the additional income was disclosed in a valid return filed after the survey, and there was no concealment or non-disclosure warranting the penalty. The order was pronounced on June 5, 2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>