<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 1198 - ITAT HYDERABAD  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284998</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order that the interest accrued on the special fund investments is not taxable in the hands of the assessee. The Tribunal affirmed that the CIT(A)&#039;s order is consistent with the ITAT&#039;s earlier decision and the provisions of the IT Act, 1961. The department&#039;s contention that the interest income has not been shown by REC does not justify taxing it in the hands of the assessee. All appeals by the department were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 18:14:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 1198 - ITAT HYDERABAD  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284998</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order that the interest accrued on the special fund investments is not taxable in the hands of the assessee. The Tribunal affirmed that the CIT(A)&#039;s order is consistent with the ITAT&#039;s earlier decision and the provisions of the IT Act, 1961. The department&#039;s contention that the interest income has not been shown by REC does not justify taxing it in the hands of the assessee. All appeals by the department were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>