<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1947 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285003</link>
    <description>No interim writ relief was granted against the proposed setting up of a TASMAC shop because the action had not yet been implemented, making judicial interference premature. The High Court declined to exercise extraordinary writ jurisdiction to restrain a merely proposed administrative step in the absence of a concrete cause for immediate intervention. It also directed that the petitioners&#039; objections and the fourth respondent&#039;s pending application be considered afresh by the official respondents in accordance with law, rather than deciding the merits itself. The writ petitions were disposed of without any interim stay on the proposed shop and without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 18:14:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1947 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285003</link>
      <description>No interim writ relief was granted against the proposed setting up of a TASMAC shop because the action had not yet been implemented, making judicial interference premature. The High Court declined to exercise extraordinary writ jurisdiction to restrain a merely proposed administrative step in the absence of a concrete cause for immediate intervention. It also directed that the petitioners&#039; objections and the fourth respondent&#039;s pending application be considered afresh by the official respondents in accordance with law, rather than deciding the merits itself. The writ petitions were disposed of without any interim stay on the proposed shop and without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>