<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 856 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389973</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand related to construction of residential flats due to the absence of a service tax recovery mechanism. The decision was based on legal precedents and the absence of a stay on the High Court&#039;s order pending appeal in the Apex Court. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the confirmed demand subject to interest and penalty, while the major demand was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 11:13:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 856 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389973</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand related to construction of residential flats due to the absence of a service tax recovery mechanism. The decision was based on legal precedents and the absence of a stay on the High Court&#039;s order pending appeal in the Apex Court. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the confirmed demand subject to interest and penalty, while the major demand was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>