<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 854 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389971</link>
    <description>The tribunal overturned the rejection of a refund claim for construction services, telephone services, canteen services, housekeeping services, and group health insurance, finding that these services qualified as input services under the definition in force before April 1, 2011. The tribunal noted that previous decisions supported the eligibility of such services for credit/refund and highlighted that credit for construction services had been allowed in the appellant&#039;s case before. As a result, the tribunal set aside the rejection of the refund for the mentioned services and allowed the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 11:11:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 854 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389971</link>
      <description>The tribunal overturned the rejection of a refund claim for construction services, telephone services, canteen services, housekeeping services, and group health insurance, finding that these services qualified as input services under the definition in force before April 1, 2011. The tribunal noted that previous decisions supported the eligibility of such services for credit/refund and highlighted that credit for construction services had been allowed in the appellant&#039;s case before. As a result, the tribunal set aside the rejection of the refund for the mentioned services and allowed the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>