<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 841 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389958</link>
    <description>Where a contract prescribes a reciprocal panel-based method for constituting the arbitral tribunal, that agreed mechanism should ordinarily be followed and not replaced by an independent sole arbitrator under general Section 11 powers. Retired Railway officers proposed from the panel were not automatically ineligible under Section 12(5) read with the Seventh Schedule merely because of past service, absent a disqualifying relationship. The ineligibility principle in TRF Limited did not apply in the same way to a two-sided selection process, so the General Manager was not disqualified from participating in the agreed appointment procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 10:12:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 841 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389958</link>
      <description>Where a contract prescribes a reciprocal panel-based method for constituting the arbitral tribunal, that agreed mechanism should ordinarily be followed and not replaced by an independent sole arbitrator under general Section 11 powers. Retired Railway officers proposed from the panel were not automatically ineligible under Section 12(5) read with the Seventh Schedule merely because of past service, absent a disqualifying relationship. The ineligibility principle in TRF Limited did not apply in the same way to a two-sided selection process, so the General Manager was not disqualified from participating in the agreed appointment procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>