<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1378 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284982</link>
    <description>Mandatory arrest safeguards must be followed, including necessity of arrest, notice where arrest is not immediately required, arrest memo, intimation to relatives, and prompt production before a Magistrate. Repeated departures from these requirements rendered the arrest and detention unlawful, and the court recognised a public law remedy in compensation for the violation of liberty and dignity. The remaining FIR allegations did not disclose the essential ingredients of cheating; the dispute was essentially civil, and no sustainable basis remained to continue the prosecution. The criminal proceedings were quashed and the refusal to discharge was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 10:01:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1378 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284982</link>
      <description>Mandatory arrest safeguards must be followed, including necessity of arrest, notice where arrest is not immediately required, arrest memo, intimation to relatives, and prompt production before a Magistrate. Repeated departures from these requirements rendered the arrest and detention unlawful, and the court recognised a public law remedy in compensation for the violation of liberty and dignity. The remaining FIR allegations did not disclose the essential ingredients of cheating; the dispute was essentially civil, and no sustainable basis remained to continue the prosecution. The criminal proceedings were quashed and the refusal to discharge was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>