<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 840 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389957</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned judgment and order dated 18th December 2018. The court quashed the show-cause notices issued by the respondents, emphasizing that the 2016 amendment did not have retrospective effect and that the 1988 Act was inoperative without procedural rules. The court clarified that the respondents could take appropriate steps in accordance with the law as advised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 17:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 840 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389957</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned judgment and order dated 18th December 2018. The court quashed the show-cause notices issued by the respondents, emphasizing that the 2016 amendment did not have retrospective effect and that the 1988 Act was inoperative without procedural rules. The court clarified that the respondents could take appropriate steps in accordance with the law as advised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>