<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1549 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284980</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for both assessment years, deleting the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the absence of incriminating evidence and held that Explanation 5A could not apply without such evidence. Distinguishing precedents, the Tribunal concluded that penalties cannot be imposed without incriminating documents. The judgment was pronounced on 19/07/2019 at Ahmedabad.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2019 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1549 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284980</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for both assessment years, deleting the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the absence of incriminating evidence and held that Explanation 5A could not apply without such evidence. Distinguishing precedents, the Tribunal concluded that penalties cannot be imposed without incriminating documents. The judgment was pronounced on 19/07/2019 at Ahmedabad.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>