<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 830 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389947</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal in favor of the assessee regarding the interpretation of Sections 10B(2)(ii) and 10B(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Act on manufacturing activity, as it was settled by a prior judgment. The Court also declined to address the calculation of allowable loss percentage under the Act, stating it was a factual rather than a legal issue. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on both grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 19:26:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 830 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389947</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal in favor of the assessee regarding the interpretation of Sections 10B(2)(ii) and 10B(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Act on manufacturing activity, as it was settled by a prior judgment. The Court also declined to address the calculation of allowable loss percentage under the Act, stating it was a factual rather than a legal issue. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on both grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>