<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 824 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389941</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the levy of fees under Section 234E for periods before 01/06/2015 was not valid due to the procedural and prospective nature of the amendment to Section 200A. The Tribunal upheld the levy of interest but deemed the demand for fees under Section 234E as invalid and deleted. The appeal was decided in favor of the appellant on 10th December 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 824 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389941</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the levy of fees under Section 234E for periods before 01/06/2015 was not valid due to the procedural and prospective nature of the amendment to Section 200A. The Tribunal upheld the levy of interest but deemed the demand for fees under Section 234E as invalid and deleted. The appeal was decided in favor of the appellant on 10th December 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>