<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (2) TMI 48 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20782</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the deduction of liabilities amounting to Rs. 13,93,61,581 for calculating capital under section 80J, in line with established precedent. Additionally, the expenditure of Rs. 6,41,193 on constructing a jetty was considered revenue expenditure, following a Supreme Court ruling, and allowed as a deduction in determining business income. The judgment did not address the claims for one-third of the jetty expenditure as revenue or for depreciation on the jetty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:53:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (2) TMI 48 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20782</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the deduction of liabilities amounting to Rs. 13,93,61,581 for calculating capital under section 80J, in line with established precedent. Additionally, the expenditure of Rs. 6,41,193 on constructing a jetty was considered revenue expenditure, following a Supreme Court ruling, and allowed as a deduction in determining business income. The judgment did not address the claims for one-third of the jetty expenditure as revenue or for depreciation on the jetty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>