<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 811 - ITAT GUWAHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389928</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessees, as the Assessing Officer&#039;s reliance on general reports and observations without specific evidence was deemed insufficient to disprove the assessees&#039; claims of genuine Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG). Emphasizing the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice and requiring specific evidence, the Tribunal deleted the impugned additions under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and allowed the appeals in favor of the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 811 - ITAT GUWAHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389928</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessees, as the Assessing Officer&#039;s reliance on general reports and observations without specific evidence was deemed insufficient to disprove the assessees&#039; claims of genuine Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG). Emphasizing the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice and requiring specific evidence, the Tribunal deleted the impugned additions under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and allowed the appeals in favor of the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>