<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 810 - ATPMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389927</link>
    <description>SC dismissed restoration applications in multiple appeals. Appellants claimed lack of communication and unawareness, while respondent highlighted past non-compliance and property sale attempts. Despite arguments of imprisonment and legal representation changes, the SC found insufficient grounds for restoration. The tribunal rejected restoration pleas, emphasizing adherence to legal directives and judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 810 - ATPMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389927</link>
      <description>SC dismissed restoration applications in multiple appeals. Appellants claimed lack of communication and unawareness, while respondent highlighted past non-compliance and property sale attempts. Despite arguments of imprisonment and legal representation changes, the SC found insufficient grounds for restoration. The tribunal rejected restoration pleas, emphasizing adherence to legal directives and judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>