<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 801 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389918</link>
    <description>The court directed DGFT to process the re-transmitted bills for MEIS benefits and resolve any remaining issues. The technical glitch causing non-submission of shipping bills online was addressed, with 40 bills re-transmitted to ICEGATE. The remaining three bills were to be submitted for verification. Once verified, MEIS benefits would be processed. The petition was allowed with no costs, disposing of all pending applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 801 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389918</link>
      <description>The court directed DGFT to process the re-transmitted bills for MEIS benefits and resolve any remaining issues. The technical glitch causing non-submission of shipping bills online was addressed, with 40 bills re-transmitted to ICEGATE. The remaining three bills were to be submitted for verification. Once verified, MEIS benefits would be processed. The petition was allowed with no costs, disposing of all pending applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>