<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 790 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389907</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication, granting the appellants the opportunity to present their case with all relevant documentary evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of allowing the assessee to present relevant defense documents during adjudication and ensuring a fair assessment process. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was also remanded due to a quantification issue, ensuring fairness in the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:59:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 790 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389907</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication, granting the appellants the opportunity to present their case with all relevant documentary evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of allowing the assessee to present relevant defense documents during adjudication and ensuring a fair assessment process. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was also remanded due to a quantification issue, ensuring fairness in the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>