<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1747 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284962</link>
    <description>The court condoned a 30-day delay in re-filing, allowed the application, upheld the disallowance of interest paid on borrowed capital, and found no grounds to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The court determined that the impugned order aligned with legal principles and dismissed the appeal, concluding that no substantial question of law was raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 18:17:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1747 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284962</link>
      <description>The court condoned a 30-day delay in re-filing, allowed the application, upheld the disallowance of interest paid on borrowed capital, and found no grounds to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The court determined that the impugned order aligned with legal principles and dismissed the appeal, concluding that no substantial question of law was raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>