https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284965 Availability of an appeal against an interim injunction under the Code of Civil Procedure barred recourse to supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, so the High Court should not have interfered when a direct appellate remedy existed. The Court also held that a reasoned injunction order passed after hearing both sides could not be set aside merely because the High Court considered the trial proceedings to have moved too quickly; if further scrutiny was needed, remand was the proper course. The High Court's order was therefore unsustainable, the trial court's injunction was restored, and directions were issued for the society's election process. en-us Thu, 03 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Jan 2025 15:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284965 Availability of an appeal against an interim injunction under the Code of Civil Procedure barred recourse to supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, so the High Court should not have interfered when a direct appellate remedy existed. The Court also held that a reasoned injunction order passed after hearing both sides could not be set aside merely because the High Court considered the trial proceedings to have moved too quickly; if further scrutiny was needed, remand was the proper course. The High Court's order was therefore unsustainable, the trial court's injunction was restored, and directions were issued for the society's election process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284965