https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389900 The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding it had jurisdiction at the time of filing and that the Corporate Debtor received sufficient notice but chose not to participate. The stay on the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was vacated, and the directors were directed to cooperate with the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). The application was dismissed, the CIRP stay was lifted, and the directors were instructed to assist the IRP. en-us Tue, 05 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Dec 2019 18:17:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389900 The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding it had jurisdiction at the time of filing and that the Corporate Debtor received sufficient notice but chose not to participate. The stay on the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was vacated, and the directors were directed to cooperate with the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). The application was dismissed, the CIRP stay was lifted, and the directors were instructed to assist the IRP. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Tue, 05 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389900