https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389895 The court upheld the detention of goods subject to a penalty order, emphasizing the need for compliance with statutory provisions. The petitioner was directed to await the appeal outcome or provide a bank guarantee for the tax and penalty amounts to secure the release of goods. Failure to provide security could lead to confiscation under the CGST Act. The court stressed the importance of adhering to legal requirements to prevent confiscation and instructed the respondent to decide on the appeal within three months. en-us Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Mar 2025 10:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389895 The court upheld the detention of goods subject to a penalty order, emphasizing the need for compliance with statutory provisions. The petitioner was directed to await the appeal outcome or provide a bank guarantee for the tax and penalty amounts to secure the release of goods. Failure to provide security could lead to confiscation under the CGST Act. The court stressed the importance of adhering to legal requirements to prevent confiscation and instructed the respondent to decide on the appeal within three months. Case-Laws GST Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389895