<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 777 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389894</link>
    <description>The Respondent in the case was found to have contravened Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 by not passing on the benefit of additional input tax credit to buyers. The Respondent was ordered to refund the profiteered amount of Rs. 2,58,80,927 with interest and faced a penalty under Section 171 (3A). The authority directed the Commissioners of CGST/SGST Haryana to ensure compliance with the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 15:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 777 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389894</link>
      <description>The Respondent in the case was found to have contravened Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 by not passing on the benefit of additional input tax credit to buyers. The Respondent was ordered to refund the profiteered amount of Rs. 2,58,80,927 with interest and faced a penalty under Section 171 (3A). The authority directed the Commissioners of CGST/SGST Haryana to ensure compliance with the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>